REFLEKSI EPISTEMOLOGIS RISET PENDIDIKAN SENI
TANTANGAN DAN IMPLIKASI BAGI PENGEMBANGAN RISET LEMBAGA
Keywords:
Epistemologi, Paradigma, Riset, Pendidikan Seni, InterdisiplinAbstract
Artikel ini membahas refleksi epistemologis sebagai implikasi paradigmatik dalam riset pendidikan seni pada program magister dan doktoral, sekaligus menyoroti tantangan yang dihadapi lembaga. Refleksi epistemologis dimaknai sebagai proses kritis untuk mempertanyakan dasar-dasar pengetahuan dan metodologi yang digunakan dalam riset seni. Pendidikan seni memiliki fakta ontologis yang khas sehingga memerlukan metode penelitian yang lebih terbuka. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui tinjauan literatur dan analisis kritis kasus terkait, artikel ini menguraikan diskursus epistemologis yang mencakup peran subjektivitas, interpretasi, dan nilai-nilai dalam menghasilkan pengetahuan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pengembangan riset pendidikan seni memerlukan pemahaman paradigmatik yang menekankan dialog lintas disiplin sebagai konsekuensi epistemologis. Tantangan utama adalah memadukan kerangka tradisional ilmu pengetahuan dengan kekhasan seni yang inklusif dan multidimensional. Implikasinya bagi lembaga riset mencakup perluasan metodologi, penguatan studi interdisiplin, dan integrasi keragaman epistemologis dalam pendekatan riset, khususnya pada program magister dan doktoral.
Downloads
References
Brad Wray, K. (2010). Kuhn and the discovery of paradigms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109359778
Bresler, L. (2007). International handbook of research in arts education (1st ed., Vol. 16). Springer.
Davidavičienė, V. (2018). Research methodology: An introduction. In J. Marx Gómez & S. Mouselli (Eds.), Modernizing the academic teaching and research environment: Methodologies and cases in business research (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_1
El-Abiad, Z., & El-Chaarani, H. (2023). How to write your PhD thesis: The easy handbook. Journal of Contemporary Research in Business Administration and Economic Sciences, 3(1).
Gong, K. (2022). Open science: The science paradigm of the new era. Cultures of Science, 5(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083221091867
Haskell, C. D. (2017). Institutional research as a bridge. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 11(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-08-2017-001
Morris, J. E., & Paris, L. F. (2022). Rethinking arts-based research methods in education: Enhanced participant engagement processes to increase research credibility and knowledge translation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1926971
Newman, J. (2024). Promoting interdisciplinary research collaboration: A systematic review, a critical literature review, and a pathway forward. Social Epistemology, 38(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2172694
Overton, W. F. (2012). Evolving scientific paradigms: Retrospective and prospective. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Paradigms in theory construction (pp. 31–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_3
Pepperel, R. (2015). Artworks as dichotomous objects: Implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00255
Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/13949
Purwanti, A. R., Hidayat, N., & Sutisna, E. (2019). Peningkatan produktivitas kerja dosen melalui pengembangan efektivitas sistem informasi manajemen dan budaya organisasi. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.21009/jmp.v7i2.13319
Rahman, M. M. (2023). Navigating the landscape of research paradigms: An overview and critique. International Journal of Educational Studies, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.53935/2641533x.v6i1.252
Ratcliffe, J. W. (1983). Notions of validity in qualitative research methodology. Science Communication, 5(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708300500201
Rohidi, T. R. (2014). Metodologi penelitian seni. Cipta Prima Nusantara.
Salim, A., Harifa, A., Munib, A., Baedhowi, Gaol, H. L., & Sutadji, I. (2008). Indonesia belajarlah (A. Salim, Ed.). UNNES & Tiara Wacana.
Shils, E. (1993). Etika akademis. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Sol, K., & Heng, K. (2022). Understanding epistemology and its key approaches in research. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 80–99.
Sugiarto, E. (2015). Kajian interdisiplin dalam penelitian pendidikan seni rupa: Substansi kajian dan implikasi metodologis. Imajinasi: Jurnal Seni, 9(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/imajinasi.v9i1.8408
Sugiarto, E., & Rohidi, T. R. (2021). Pendidikan seni berbasis masyarakat: Pandangan paradigmatik untuk arah pendidikan seni. LPPM UNNES.
Sugiarto, E., Sinaga, S., Hartono, Cahyini, A., & Utomo, U. (2023). Laporan evaluasi diri akreditasi S2 pendidikan seni.
Sugiharto, B. (2018). Humanisme dan humaniora: Relevansinya bagi pendidikan (B. Sugiharto, Ed.).
Swing, R. L., & Ross, L. E. (2016a). A new vision for institutional research. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 48(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2016.1163132
Swing, R. L., & Ross, L. E. (2016b). A new vision for institutional research. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 48(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2016.1163132
Taylor, P. C., & Medina, M. N. D. (2013). Educational research paradigms: From positivism to multiparadigmatic. Journal for Meaning-Centered Education, 1(1), 1–8.
UNESCO. (2006). Road map for arts education: Building creative capacities for the 21st century. The World Conference on Arts Education, Lisbon, Portugal, 6–9 March.
UNESCO. (2022). Joint appeal for open science. UNESCO.
Wahab, A. A., Kurniady, D. A., Sobari, A. M., & Nurusyifai, A. (2021). Produktivitas dan peningkatan kinerja akademik dosen dalam bidang penelitian. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v18i2.34602
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eko Sugiarto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
